Obese Women Vulva Images

Needs nominal


"Love is blind God is love, Ray Charles is blind. Therefore Ray Charles is God "
Vinicio Capossela

names by a word is the result of a logical, intuitive, perhaps, towards the identification of things. As happened in many historical situations in which the first invaders were trying to communicate through their own language with the people they met. The result: gestures, signs, pictures, sounds. Basically they tried to enter the first segments of language to carry out conversations more daring, then they both need to know the name of the things that made up the place. They tried to interpret the new language, the first symptoms of translation.
was a need, and still is the need to understand things. Appoint
around what we have allows us to interpret them, to arrive at an etymology, deepen the subject. Interpret it for the first time, translate it if it already has a name and then appoint or we call it.
What fascinates me is the name of the first things that is then implemented the translation, which complicates the procedure, is when the subject is distorted and needs to be addressed through a new name, and then we use the translation, but not of ' interpretative imagination.
Currently extending this practice to the realm of art, many of us have the means and the desire to interpret what he sees?
is perhaps a rhetorical question because we all have the means to reach its own interpretation of things, but perhaps as few have the desire to stop and ask.
I constantly ask myself what I produce even though I know what I draw. Objects known from the beginning of a new nature, but still names to its origin. A destabilizing
advantage, a disadvantage to the need intuitive.

The social need for the cabinet to conduct some trade-offs that are undermined when it crumbles intuition rated of the subject-mobile. The destabilization of the press seems to need a counterpart: the subject is what I need and helps me to fill a need, the subject is not because it solves one of my needs.
So I can assume that the transfiguration (or re-representation) of a subject to which the community has given a name by the need, has no value if it can not be named.
If all this could be resolved with logical reasoning, I, for one, I would be stripped of my own limits of interpretation, as I create only through things that are already recognizable. I look good and not only implement a logical process of "intellectual and artistic appreciation object "but, in fact, destabilizing the need for playing with things that I avoid giving a new name just because the translation does not make use of the imagination. As if to say: it could be something else but it is not, might be what it was but it is not. This is what is not.